When leadership means something different

  1. Share
1 0

Culture significantly influences how the following statements are made, and how people respond to them.

  • “We should take the initiative”
  • “We should wait until we are asked for help”
  • “This could turn out to be a great political manoeuvre”
  • “Let’s not do anything, as it might be seen as a sign of weakness”
  • “We should take control”

Learning how other cultures define and express leadership is crucial in gaining and maintaining market share for any business trying to expand its operations beyond its own borders.

While it is often easier to emphasise specific leadership attributes we believe a particular situation might need, this is sometimes inadequate as we interact with organizations in different countries.

Wibbeke highlights the importance of valuing intercultural perspectives and compares leadership definitions between eastern [collective, holistic, spirituality-based] and western cultures [hierarchical, authority-based, and individualistic] [i] .

 For example,

  • In French, leadership (‘conduite’) means to guide one’s own behavior, to guide others, or command action. Although the French are famous for protesting, in France, authority holds deference and respect
  • In German, leadership (‘Führung’) means guidance. In organizations, it is construed as a way to reduce uncertainty. The leader guides action and motivates others through guiding by certain rules
  • In Chinese, leadership means ‘the leader and the led.’ The leader is one who ‘walks in front’ and guides the group through teaching ‘the way.’ The implication is that leadership can only occur through relationship
  • In Arabic, the word ‘Sheikh’ has different meanings according to the regional culture within the Middle East. Literally, ‘Sheikh’ means a man over 40 years. However, in the Gulf and Saudi Arabia it means a person from the Royal Family, and in Egypt, a scholar of religion. In Lebanon, ‘Sheikh’ means a religious leader, even among Christians.

All of this to confirm that leadership is not the same in every culture.

 

What’s the bottom-line?

It should come as no surprise that the words we use to define leadership in our own culture can often cause confusion and offense when dealing with people from a different ethnic origin. Understanding this reality has wide-reaching implications for how effective we are in building strategic business partnerships outside our current borders, and how we respond to a culturally-diverse workplace.

 

[i] E. S. Wibbeke, Global Business Leadership (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemanne, 2009), 18.

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Comments

To leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

0
Are we really surprised to find a link between character and performance?
In the 2018 LCP Global Leadership Survey, we asked 134 Board Chairs, CEOs, executives and senior leaders to respond to a short survey exploring their thoughts on this topic. Apart from my own leadership experiences in seeing the importance of this relationship over the last 25 years, I have extensively researched this topic since 2010 and am still amazed that many do not believe there is a link between character and performance. There is often an interesting psychology behind this, hidden by the economic justification for expediency in delivering short-term results without regard for the damage this can do to the credibility and performance of a brand over time. For now, I merely want to highlight some of the preliminary insights from our analysis. From the eighty respondents, 95 percent agreed that there is a link between the integrity of the leadership team and the success of the business. 5 percent disagreed.  We next asked them how they would describe this link? The three most dominant themes describing this link were: Great values don’t guarantee immediate success. However, there was acknowledgement that the best people thrive in an environment where there is a commitment to strong values. In the short-term it affects the recruitment and retention of great talent; longer-term, the relationship between values and success becomes more pronounced. People want to do business with organizations and people they can trust — trust is the currency through which a business can succeed, and it is clearly much more than a mere transaction. Closely related to the above, there was a clear belief that business success should be measured beyond monetary value. What's the bottom-line? Building resilient character is an indispensable quality for any business, and without it, many corporate collapses and leadership failures provide evidence of how catastrophic the results can be. Here at LCP Global we are passionate about putting character high on the agenda for businesses that want to achieve great results without having to compromise their integrity. Building Resilient Character is one of the 5 Leadership Anchors™ LCP Global presents as part of a systematic and strategic approach to increasing leadership capacity.
0
What does Intel’s powerful microchip have in common with the Volkswagen Beetle?
Heavy fog found me sitting in a crowded lounge at Sydney Airport when Tony and Carlo asked if they could join me at my table. After we had introduced ourselves, our conversation surprisingly turned to the anxiety many young people experience in relation to career choices and the future of work. This quickly led to a discussion on the pace and pervasiveness of change. Ray Kurzweil, Director of Engineering at Google, states: We’re entering an age of acceleration. The models underlying society at every level, which are largely based on a linear model of change, are going to have to be redefined. Because of the explosive power of exponential growth, the 21st century will be equivalent to 20,000 years of progress at today’s rate of progress; organizations have to be able to redefine themselves at a faster and faster pace(Friedman, 2016, pp. 187)[i] . To help us understand the enormity of change and the urgency it creates for us to adapt, Thomas Friedman applies “Moore’s Law” when contrasting the processing power of Intel’s microchip and the Volkswagen Beetle. In 1965, Intel cofounder Gordon Moore believed that computational processing power would double roughly every two years. Intel’s latest chip offers 3,500 times more performance than the company’s first-generation microchip from 1971. It’s also 90,000 times more energy-efficient and about 60,000 times cheaper. If you apply this same principle of change from Moore’s Law to a VW Beetle, the Beetle would go about 300,000 miles per hour, get 2 million miles per gallon of petrol, and cost four cents. If fuel efficiency improved at the same rate, you could drive your car your entire life on one tank of fuel! When the rate of change exceeds our ability to adapt, we get “dislocation,” when people feel they can’t keep up with what’s going on (Duhigg, 2016, pp. 88) [i]. If change is doubling or tripling or quadrupling, how do we adapt to it and help others to adapt?   Identify What You Can Control And What You Can’t. Consider what you can influence and what, for the time being, you are unable to. Stephen Covey alludes to this in his “Circle of Concern, Circle of Influence” model. Change takes energy. Focus on the relationships and activities that energize you the most. They will keep you grounded about what is really important in life.   Reflect On The Possibilities Of What Change Will Bring. Tell yourself stories about what you can expect to see. Rather than focus on the problem or the actual change itself, anticipate what might happen and how you might respond. Psychologists call this type of scenario-planning, “mental models"[ii]. Rather than become overwhelmed by change, commit yourself to the potential of what it will bring and the personal opportunities for growth.   [i] Friedman, Thomas L. (2016). Thank you for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations. New York, USA: Allen Lane. [ii] Duhigg, Charles. (2016). Smarter, Faster, Better: The Transformative Power of Real Productivity. New York, USA: Random House.