Is the pursuit of balance getting in the way of success?

  1. Share
1 0

In Margaret Wheatley’s book, Leadership and the New Science, she challenges traditional perspectives on achieving balance, or equilibrium. She shares the following story –

The daily news is filled with powerful changes, and many of us feel buffeted by forces we cannot control… I listened one night to a radio interview with a geologist whose specialty was beaches and shorelines. The interview was being conducted as a huge hurricane was pounding the Outer Banks of the eastern United States… The interviewer asked: “What do you expect to find when you go out there?”

Like the interviewer, I assumed he would present a litany of disasters – demolished homes, felled trees, eroded shoreline. But he surprised me. “I expect,” he said calmly, “to find a new beach (Wheatley, 2006, pp. 137) [i].

A life that is immune from chaos, disorder, disturbance and disequilibrium, says Wheatley, does not allow us to be recipients of new information that has the potential to foster growth and new life, thereby leaving us empty and one step closer to death.

She challenges our pursuit of balance and comfort where we largely seek to minimise change, claiming that equilibrium has become a prized goal in adult life. She argues that to pursue such a state leaves us without the energy and drive to respond to change leaving us with no capacity to grow (Wheatley, 2006, pp. 75) [i]. Consequently, we feel it is sometimes easier to not forge ahead or take risks, but to return to a place of comfort. 

This leads us to the importance of evaluating how we currently react to change; understanding that we can sometimes become so fixated on the one factor that is pressuring change, that we miss the whole. In a self-fulfilling way we see a disastrous, or unwanted result rather than potential growth from processing new information and the new relationships that may result from it. We can’t see the benefit beyond the immediate chaos and confusion. We don’t see a new beach.

What’s the bottom-line?

Whether we experience tragedy or chaos as a person, or find ourselves in a context where change is rampant or imminent, we can choose how we process change. We do this by asking what we want to learn from it and sometimes even appreciate why change might be necessary. The key is to embrace it, not avoid it or use all our energy trying to keep it at bay.

There are many people (and businesses) in crisis. Not because they lack the resources or potential to change, but because they have become wearied by the energy it takes to preserve itself in that state where they lack the ability and capacity to look beyond the storm to the new beach.

I find myself questioning whether I, too, am more comfortable with preserving my current context rather than seeing new challenges as opportunities for growth, new beginnings, and greater success.

Perhaps it’s time for me to take a walk along a new beach!

 


[i] Wheatley, Margaret. (2006). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Comments

To leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

0
How the dance of chaos and order can unleash new ideas
In Leadership & the New Science, Wheatley explores a perspective on leadership rarely heard. Pushing us beyond Sir Isaac Newton’s mechanistic theories of why things work the way they do, Wheatley forces us to think more about the relationship of how things work together in a symbiotic and complementary manner where relationships are rarely static. This challenges our preconceived notions and assumptions that organizational structures exist to create order by minimizing disorder and chaos. However, rather than view disorder and chaos as disruptive and unwanted, they can play a significant role in creating a new order when the old order is no longer sustainable. A new way of thinking is unleashed! Wheatley cites the work of Nobel Peace Prize winner in chemistry, Ilya Prigogine, where his Theory of Dissipative Structures advocates that disturbance plays a crucial role in helping to self-organise into a new order  (Wheatley, 2006, pp. 20) [i]. New conditions unsettle a system’s equilibrium and create opportunities to awaken creativity and new resolutions. We grow up believing that ‘chaos’ and ‘normal’ are two separate states, rather than performing a unique dance where “neither one is primary; but both are absolutely necessary.” Similarly, in the context of our desire for order in our organizations, we often find we focus on more rigid structures rather than fluid processes that inject creativity into the ebb and flow of chaos as it pushes up against a set order.   What’s the bottom-line? What is important is that we should not run from chaos or seek to overturn it, but appreciate and encourage constant interchanges between chaos and order to bring about new orders and fresh ideas. This doesn’t mean we have to seek chaos and disorder to unleash creativity. Instead, we should seek to embrace the conflict even if the temptation is to revert to risk-adverse decisions, or a management style, organizational structure, and set of processes that have served us well in the past. Wheatley is not suggesting that structure is unimportant. She does believe, however, that blind adherence to any one particular structure or way of doing things may in fact prevent growth, impede development and ultimately lead to the atrophy of a business. The old way of doing things is often time-limited. Is it time to embrace the dance of chaos and order to find new ideas that will launch your business into another stratosphere?   [i] Wheatley, Margaret. (2006). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
0
What does Intel’s powerful microchip have in common with the Volkswagen Beetle?
Heavy fog found me sitting in a crowded lounge at Sydney Airport when Tony and Carlo asked if they could join me at my table. After we had introduced ourselves, our conversation surprisingly turned to the anxiety many young people experience in relation to career choices and the future of work. This quickly led to a discussion on the pace and pervasiveness of change. Ray Kurzweil, Director of Engineering at Google, states: We’re entering an age of acceleration. The models underlying society at every level, which are largely based on a linear model of change, are going to have to be redefined. Because of the explosive power of exponential growth, the 21st century will be equivalent to 20,000 years of progress at today’s rate of progress; organizations have to be able to redefine themselves at a faster and faster pace(Friedman, 2016, pp. 187)[i] . To help us understand the enormity of change and the urgency it creates for us to adapt, Thomas Friedman applies “Moore’s Law” when contrasting the processing power of Intel’s microchip and the Volkswagen Beetle. In 1965, Intel cofounder Gordon Moore believed that computational processing power would double roughly every two years. Intel’s latest chip offers 3,500 times more performance than the company’s first-generation microchip from 1971. It’s also 90,000 times more energy-efficient and about 60,000 times cheaper. If you apply this same principle of change from Moore’s Law to a VW Beetle, the Beetle would go about 300,000 miles per hour, get 2 million miles per gallon of petrol, and cost four cents. If fuel efficiency improved at the same rate, you could drive your car your entire life on one tank of fuel! When the rate of change exceeds our ability to adapt, we get “dislocation,” when people feel they can’t keep up with what’s going on (Duhigg, 2016, pp. 88) [i]. If change is doubling or tripling or quadrupling, how do we adapt to it and help others to adapt?   Identify What You Can Control And What You Can’t. Consider what you can influence and what, for the time being, you are unable to. Stephen Covey alludes to this in his “Circle of Concern, Circle of Influence” model. Change takes energy. Focus on the relationships and activities that energize you the most. They will keep you grounded about what is really important in life.   Reflect On The Possibilities Of What Change Will Bring. Tell yourself stories about what you can expect to see. Rather than focus on the problem or the actual change itself, anticipate what might happen and how you might respond. Psychologists call this type of scenario-planning, “mental models"[ii]. Rather than become overwhelmed by change, commit yourself to the potential of what it will bring and the personal opportunities for growth.   [i] Friedman, Thomas L. (2016). Thank you for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations. New York, USA: Allen Lane. [ii] Duhigg, Charles. (2016). Smarter, Faster, Better: The Transformative Power of Real Productivity. New York, USA: Random House.