How serving others can be the foundation of our success

  1. Share
0 0

I have observed that for many people it is easy for their focus to shift from serving a need (outward orientation) to serving themselves (inward orientation), often causing a significant issue with the sustainability of their business.

‘Service’ is different depending on the organizational context. For most businesses, ‘service’ has more to do with making profit from meeting an identified need in the market. In the not-for-profit context, ‘service’ usually relates to delivering a product or service for the betterment of others, without the need for shareholders to make a profit from it. However, while many people and organizations start out being motivated to serve the needs of others, sometimes their own needs and goals begin to dominate their focus and effort.

In Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power & Greatness, Greenleaf (1977)[i] provides some key insights that seek to challenge our thinking about leadership and how it is exercised.

Ultimately, it is focused on serving the vision, and the needs of colleagues who are stewards of the resources needed to fulfil that vision. Keith, CEO of the Greenleaf Center, and author of The Case for Servant Leadership, identifies seven key practices of servant-leaders (2008)[ii]. Imagine if we could leverage their importance in the way we work:

  • Self-awareness
  • Listening
  • Changing the pyramid
  • Developing your colleagues
  • Coaching not controlling
  • Unleashing the energy and intelligence of others
  • Foresight

 

What's the bottom-line?

Unlike approaches to leadership founded on a top-down hierarchical style, a servant-leader approach emphasises collaboration, trust, empathy and empowerment.

I wonder what our businesses would look like if we pursued success built on a foundation of serving others?

 

[i]  Greenleaf, Robert K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power & Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.

[ii] Keith, Kent. (2008). The Case for Servant Leadership. Westfield, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

5 Leadership Anchors

Comments

To leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

0
What do leaders do when their values are in conflict with the organizations they lead?
While 95 percent of the eighty Board Chairs, CEOs, executives and senior leaders who responded to LCP's 2018 Global Leadership Survey agreed there is a link between character and performance, we asked them how they responded when there was a conflict between their own personal values and those of the organization? They are grouped into three dominant themes: 1. Resignation 27 percent resigned. They believed they were not able to influence a positive change in ethical behavior or could not do it because of how deeply entrenched some of the issues were. In nearly all cases, resignation only came after significant stress due to the efforts of those leaders who had sought to rectify things. What is alarming is, these were not middle managers. Most sit on executive teams or Boards. 2. ‘Difference’ or ‘violation’? Most considered it normal that in many organizations there would be a diversity of values held by those working in them. This would inevitably lead to disagreements on business practices and standards of behavior . It was also widely accepted that for those seeking leadership roles, choosing to work for a particular business can be due to a strong resonance with the core values of that business. The conflict occurs when it becomes clear there is a difference between the values the organisation says are important, and when in practical terms they are contradicted (internally or publicly). Even for those who resigned their leadership role believed that they could work in organizations where their values differed; not when there was a clear violation of their own deeply held values. 3. What made the difference to those who remained? While some leaders decided to leave the organization to explore opportunities more fully aligned with their values, there were those who stayed. They felt they could “work within the conflict”. Paramount to this decision was the belief that they could continue to respectfully model the values that were important to them while influencing a positive change in the culture. However, to succeed in this, it was important that they had a clear set of values considered to be non-negotiable. What's the bottom-line? Building a culture around a set of non-negotiable values is an integral part of aligning the brand internally and externally. It not only ensures greater success longer-term, but attracts and retains leaders of high integrity and competency organisations can’t afford to overlook.    Here at LCP Global we are passionate about putting character high on the agenda for businesses that want to achieve great results without having to compromise their integrity. Building Resilient Character is one of the 5 Leadership Anchors™. If you would like a copy of the full report once it is available, please email your details to [email protected].