Qualities of a good leadership coach

  1. Share
0 0

There are some excellent reasons why having an experienced leadership coach can be beneficial—

  • They coach from areas of strength that may not be areas of strength for you
  • They are an objective sounding board that brings significant experience
  • They give you the opportunity to confide in a person with whom there is no conflict of interest

Empirical research into the outcomes resulting from leadership coaching as a development intervention has been limited. However, Feldman and Lankau provide some excellent insights and provide an agenda for future research we can benefit from (2005, pp. 829)[i] . Following are two key insights.

A coach’s background and experience

Some prescribe to the belief that psychologists are the most qualified people to conduct executive coaching because of their understanding of psychological dynamics, adult development, personality and performance assessments as well as the importance of building and maintaining a trusted and confidential relationship.

Others believe the most effective executive coaches are those who are knowledgeable about the business context in which executives operate. They see “an understanding of leadership, business disciplines, management principles, and organizational politics as the critical core competency of executive coaches” (Kampa-Kokesch and Anderson, 2001, pp. 205-228) [ii] .

Desired outcomes from coaching

Usually, coaching is provided with a two-fold objective – first, to see positive changes in leadership and managerial behaviors; and second, to see an increase in performance and organizational effectiveness. There are three variables that impact the ability to measure these objectives effectively:

  1. The background and experience of the executive coach;
  2. The ability to link coaching to the organization’s business outcomes; and
  3. Whether or not the individuals receiving the coaching understand that their development intervention is more about their future than the organization’s future.

While organizations contract coaches to deliver a key service, if those being coached merely see this as an intervention that is performance-related rather than designed to develop and strengthen the individual leader, it is likely to result in limited outcomes. It is always desired that coaching come from an aspirational motivation, not a punitive measure inspired by correction—even if behavioral change is needed.

 

What’s the bottom-line?

Though it is early days, the data shows leadership coaching can clearly result in improved leadership engagement, positive behavioral changes, and stronger performance. Below are some points to consider –

  • Ensure the leadership coach you appoint has the experience and skill needed to take you, or your team, and organization to the next level. Beyond this, you also need chemistry. Is the coach a good fit for your organization?
  • While coaching may be desired to correct or change leadership behavior, how can I position this in a way that will motivate and inspire those who need coaching?
  • How am I going to evaluate the efforts of the coach I appoint? Is there a clear accountability link, or a way to measure the business outcomes?

[i] Feldman, Daniel C., and Melenie J. Lankau. (2005). “Executive Coaching: A Review and Agenda for Future Research”, Journal of Management31.

[ii] Kampa-Kokesch, S., and M. Z. Anderson. (2001). Executive coaching: A comprehensive review of the literature. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research53.

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Coaching Resources

Leadership Insights

Comments

To leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

0
Does leadership coaching improve organizational performance?
The economic downturn of 2009 led to unprecedented challenges in global competition that created high levels of anxiety and uncertainty. This significantly affected stakeholder expectations that resulted in organizations tightening their budgets and standards of governance. As companies tried to do more with less, employees were being asked to carry more load and stress in the midst of declining morale, frozen retail spending, and overwhelming job losses. While some were being made redundant or offered early retirement, some organizations saw the wisdom of acquiring and developing leadership talent. They did this through a range of development interventions that would set them apart from the competition once the economic tide turned. They also didn’t want to see the loss of their own leadership talent being acquired by other companies who saw an opportunity to address their own leadership deficiencies. While the emergence of executive coaches increased during this time, some businesses remained sceptical about the value coaching was claimed to add to the bottom-line, particularly when there appeared little attempt to measure its impact on outcomes. At its broadest level, coaching is generally defined as a “process of equipping people with the tools, knowledge, and opportunities they need to develop themselves and become more effective.”(Peterson and Hicks, 1995, pp. 41)[i] While research into the effectiveness of behavioral feedback as a method of management development has been relatively weak and inconsistent, some results show that when it is coupled with leadership coaching, subordinates indicate a small, but significant, improvement (Kochanowski, Seifert, and Yukl, 2010, pp. 363) [ii] . This was further strengthened when leaders provided opportunities, encouragement, and incentives to apply the feedback. Another key factor to delivering effective coaching, is to ensure that those receiving the coaching believe the primary motivation is “to help the employee rather than the organization” (Sue-Chan, Chen and Lam, 2011, 488)[iii]. However, from a development perspective, even though the primary goal must be individually focused, it must be clear that the organization will ultimately benefit. To better understand the impact of leadership coaching, Right Management conducted a global study of more than 28,000 employees in ten industry sectors in 15 countries. The results provided a compelling case for leadership coaching that showed when leadership development was in alignment and informed by their organization’s strategy, culture, values, processes and structure, coaching became a powerful mechanism for impacting the organization  (Right Management, 2009, pp. 10) [iv]. Leadership coaching, therefore, should never be delivered in a vacuum.   What’s the bottom-line? While it is sometimes necessary for the integrity of the coaching process to use the services of an independent coach, it is vital that all coaches be accountable—not for an individual leader's behavior, but for ensuring that the individual is equipped with strategies that empower him or her to deliver agreed business outcomes. Below are some questions to reflect on: Am I open to the idea of appointing a coach that can empower my team to focus better on delivering business outcomes my company has identified? What concerns do I have, or what constraints do I need, to overcome in order to would help me get more out of my leaders? What would I hope to achieve? What are the benefits of appointing an independent leadership coach in contrast to appointing an internal resource? [i] Peterson, D. B. and Hicks, M. D. (1995). The leader as coach: Strategies for coaching and developing others. Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions). [ii] Kochanowski, Susan, Seifert, Charles F., and Gary Yukl. (2010). Using Coaching to Enhance the Effects of Behavioral Feedback to Managers. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 17. [iii] Sue-Chan, Christina, Ziguang Chen and Wing Lam. (2011). LMX, Coaching Attributions, and Employee Performance. Group & Organization Management. 36, 4. [iv] Right Management. (2009). Aligning Leader Coaching to Business Outcomes: Australia and New Zealand. Leadership Insights. 10.