What do leaders do when their values are in conflict with the organizations they lead?

  1. Share
0 0

While 95 percent of the eighty Board Chairs, CEOs, executives and senior leaders who responded to LCP's 2018 Global Leadership Survey agreed there is a link between character and performance, we asked them how they responded when there was a conflict between their own personal values and those of the organization?

They are grouped into three dominant themes:

1. Resignation

27 percent resigned. They believed they were not able to influence a positive change in ethical behavior or could not do it because of how deeply entrenched some of the issues were. In nearly all cases, resignation only came after significant stress due to the efforts of those leaders who had sought to rectify things. What is alarming is, these were not middle managers. Most sit on executive teams or Boards.

2. ‘Difference’ or ‘violation’?

Most considered it normal that in many organizations there would be a diversity of values held by those working in them. This would inevitably lead to disagreements on business practices and standards of behavior . It was also widely accepted that for those seeking leadership roles, choosing to work for a particular business can be due to a strong resonance with the core values of that business. The conflict occurs when it becomes clear there is a difference between the values the organisation says are important, and when in practical terms they are contradicted (internally or publicly). Even for those who resigned their leadership role believed that they could work in organizations where their values differed; not when there was a clear violation of their own deeply held values.

3. What made the difference to those who remained?

While some leaders decided to leave the organization to explore opportunities more fully aligned with their values, there were those who stayed. They felt they could “work within the conflict”. Paramount to this decision was the belief that they could continue to respectfully model the values that were important to them while influencing a positive change in the culture. However, to succeed in this, it was important that they had a clear set of values considered to be non-negotiable.

What's the bottom-line?

Building a culture around a set of non-negotiable values is an integral part of aligning the brand internally and externally. It not only ensures greater success longer-term, but attracts and retains leaders of high integrity and competency organisations can’t afford to overlook. 

 

Here at LCP Global we are passionate about putting character high on the agenda for businesses that want to achieve great results without having to compromise their integrity. Building Resilient Character is one of the 5 Leadership Anchors™.

If you would like a copy of the full report once it is available, please email your details to [email protected].

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Comments

To leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

0
Are we really surprised to find a link between character and performance?
In the 2018 LCP Global Leadership Survey, we asked 134 Board Chairs, CEOs, executives and senior leaders to respond to a short survey exploring their thoughts on this topic. Apart from my own leadership experiences in seeing the importance of this relationship over the last 25 years, I have extensively researched this topic since 2010 and am still amazed that many do not believe there is a link between character and performance. There is often an interesting psychology behind this, hidden by the economic justification for expediency in delivering short-term results without regard for the damage this can do to the credibility and performance of a brand over time. For now, I merely want to highlight some of the preliminary insights from our analysis. From the eighty respondents, 95 percent agreed that there is a link between the integrity of the leadership team and the success of the business. 5 percent disagreed.  We next asked them how they would describe this link? The three most dominant themes describing this link were: Great values don’t guarantee immediate success. However, there was acknowledgement that the best people thrive in an environment where there is a commitment to strong values. In the short-term it affects the recruitment and retention of great talent; longer-term, the relationship between values and success becomes more pronounced. People want to do business with organizations and people they can trust — trust is the currency through which a business can succeed, and it is clearly much more than a mere transaction. Closely related to the above, there was a clear belief that business success should be measured beyond monetary value. What's the bottom-line? Building resilient character is an indispensable quality for any business, and without it, many corporate collapses and leadership failures provide evidence of how catastrophic the results can be. Here at LCP Global we are passionate about putting character high on the agenda for businesses that want to achieve great results without having to compromise their integrity. Building Resilient Character is one of the 5 Leadership Anchors™ LCP Global presents as part of a systematic and strategic approach to increasing leadership capacity.
0
What do narcissistic leaders and the bottom-line have in common?
In a series of studies on narcissism, Professor Alex Frino, Dean of the Macquarie School of Management, concluded that “there was a clear correlation between the level of CEO narcissism and the company’s use of ‘earnings management’ – a technique which takes advantage of the flexibility in accounting rules to inflate profit figures”  (Frino, 2014)[i]. The more narcissistic a CEO, the more likely it was that the company’s share price would fail to keep up with the market. In contrast to this, the companies with the ten least narcissistic CEOs in Australia’s top 100 companies, more than doubled the performance of the most narcissistic CEOs. Alexandre Havard believes character is the driving force behind leaders identifying what the organization needs. When leaders are ‘secure’ in themselves they know how to engage and empower people; they are not threatened by them because they are competent in certain areas (Havard, 2007)[ii] . This gives leaders the capacity and strength to act. It doesn’t take the place of professional competency, but it does help to drive and develop competencies that are needed. Covey addresses this reality when looking at ‘trust’ as an example of character and its important link with performance. To overcome the perception that character is ‘soft’ or ambiguous he wrote The Speed of Trust in an attempt to qualify how trust makes a measurable difference to the bottom-line. He came up with the formula that said, ‘when trust is high, speed is up, cost is down.’ The inverse is also true, ‘when trust is low, speed is low, cost is high’ (Covey, 2006, pp. 13)[iii] . Although at times it may seem difficult to quantify exactly how the character leads to better performance, we do know that when it is absent, organizations rapidly deteriorate and perform below what is expected.   What’s the bottom-line? Not all CEOs are narcissistic, but there is an established link between narcissistic CEOs and poorer organizational results. Below are some questions to help you reflect on the type of leader you are as you drive for results – Am I approachable? Do I welcome input from others? Am I building the environment where others flourish? Do I engage and empower my colleagues? Do I micromanage? (Am I a control freak!) Do I take credit for other people’s ideas and work? Do I take responsibility for my own errors, or do I blame others? What would others identify as being my values? Am I consistent? Do I compromise my values when it is convenient for me to do so? [i] Frino, Alex. (2014). [ii] Havard, Alexandré. (2007). Virtuous Leadership: An Agenda for Personal Excellence. New York: Scepter Publications. [iii] Covey, Stephen M. R. (2006). The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything. New York: Free Press.